Print Reference   •  Download PDF version of manuscript   •  Close window
References
1. Insall J and Aglietti P. A five to seven-year follow-up of unicondylar arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1980. 62(8): p. 1329-37.
2. Laskin RS. Unicompartmental tibiofemoral resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1978. 60(2): p. 182-5.
3. Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, and O’Connor JJ. The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1998. 80(6): p. 983-9.
4. Squire MW, et al. Unicompartmental knee replacement. A minimum 15 year followup study. Clin Orthop, 1999(367): p. 61-72.
5. Berger RA, et al., Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clinical experience at 6- to 10-year followup. Clin Orthop, 1999(367): p. 50-60.
6. McKeever D. Tibial Plateau Prosthesis. Clin Orthop, 1960(18): p. 86-95.
7. MacIntosh D. Hemiarthroplasty of the Knee using a Space Occupying Prosthesis for Painful Varus and Valgus Deformities. In Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of the Orthopaedic Associations of the English-Speaking World. J Bone Joint Surg, 1958 Dec. 40A: p. 1431.
8. Marmor L. The modular knee. Clin Orthop, 1973. 94: p. 242-8.
9. Goodfellow JW and O’Connor JJ. Clinical results of the Oxford knee. Surface arthroplasty of the tibiofemoral joint with a meniscal bearing prosthesis. Clin Orthop, 1986(205): p. 21-42.
10. Goodfellow JW and O’Connor JJ. The mechanics of the knee and prosthesis design. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1978. 60-B(3): p. 358-69.
11. Callaghan JJ, et al. Mobile-bearing knee replacement: concepts and results. Instr Course Lect, 2001. 50: p. 431-49.
12. Gunston FH. Polycentric knee arthroplasty. Prosthetic simulation of normal knee movement. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1971. 53(2): p. 272-7.
13. Engelbrecht E, et al. Statistics of total knee replacement: partial and total knee replacement, design St. Georg: a review of a 4-year observation. Clin Orthop, 1976. 00(120): p. 54-64.
14. Kozinn SC and Scott R. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1989. 71(1): p. 145-50.
15. Heck DA, et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A multicenter investigation with long-term follow-up evaluation. Clin Orthop, 1993(286): p. 154-9.
16. Ansari S, Newman JH, and Ackroyd CE. St. Georg sledge for medial compartment knee replacement. 461 arthroplasties followed for 4 (1-17) years. Acta Orthop Scand, 1997. 68(5): p. 430-4.
17. Weale AE and Newman JH. Unicompartmental arthroplasty and high tibial osteotomy for osteoarthrosis of the knee. A comparative study with a 12- to 17-year follow-up period. Clin Orthop, 1994(302): p. 134-7.
18. Broughton NS, Newman JH, and Baily RA. Unicompartmental replacement and high tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee. A comparative study after 5-10 years’ follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1986. 68(3): p. 447-52.
19. Repicci J and Eberle R. Minimally Invasive Surgical Technique for Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty. J South Orthop Soc, 1999. 8: p. 20.
20. Price AJ, et al. Rapid recovery after oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty through a short incision. J Arthroplasty, 2001 Dec. 16(8): p. 970-976.
21. Robertsson O, et al. Use of unicompartmental instead of tricompartmental prostheses for unicompartmental arthrosis in the knee is a cost-effective alternative. 15,437 primary tricompartmental prostheses were compared with 10,624 primary medial or lateral unicompartmental prostheses. Acta Orthop Scand, 1999. 70(2): p. 170-5.
22. Newman JH, Ackroyd CE, and Shah NA. Unicompartmental or total knee replacement? Five-year results of a prospective, randomised trial of 102 osteoarthritic knees with unicompartmental arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1998. 80(5): p. 862-5.
23. Rougraff BT, Heck DA, and Gibson AE. A comparison of tricompartmental and unicompartmental arthroplasty for the treatment of gonarthrosis. Clin Orthop, 1991(273): p. 157-64.
24. Laurencin CT, et al. Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient. A comparative study. Clin Orthop, 1991(273): p. 151-6.

Print Reference   •  Download PDF version of manuscript   •  Close window