| 
				
					|  | 
							 
								| 
										 
											|  |  
											| Thomas Thornhill, MD 
 |  | First Session Moderator: Thomas S. Thornhill, MD
 
 
 |  
							
								| 
										 
											|  |  |  
											| Lauren Adey, MD | Philip Blazar, MD |  | Elbow Capsulectomy for Post-Traumatic Elbow Stiffness Lauren Adey, MD
 Advisor: David Ring, MD
 Discussor: Philip Blazar, MD
 
 Previous trauma remains the most common cause of elbow stiffness. Dr.
									Adey evaluated the results of 46 patients who had undergone elbow capsulectomy
									in order to examine if there were any factors predictive of outcome.
									These patients were followed for an average of 48 months after capsular excision.
									The average improvement in ulno-humeral motion was 58 degrees
									and the average flexion arc was 103 degrees at final follow-up. Twenty-nine
									percent of patients required a second capsular excision. Dr. Adey found that
									pain and ulnar nerve dysfunction were more important determinants than
									range of motion in overall function, as measured by the DASH and MEPI
									outcomes instruments. Dr. Blazar commended Dr. Adey on addressing factors that may limit the
									restoration of function and mobility after elbow capsulectomy. Dr. Blazar
									highlighted the finding that thirty percent of patients required revision surgery.
									He also noted that in these patients, symptoms related to ulnar nerve
									dysfunction will improved over time. Overall, elbow capsulectomy is useful
									to restore functional mobility in stiff elbows with limited arthrosis, although
									more than one procedure may be needed.
 |  
 
							
								| 
										 
											|  |  |  
											| Brent Ponce, MD | James Kasser, MD |  | Relationship Between Complications and Timing of Follow-up After Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning of Supracondylar Fractures
 Brent Ponce, MD
 Discussor: James Kasser, MD
 Advisor: Peter Waters, MD
 
 Up to 75% of pediatric fractures occur in the upper extremity, with supracondylar
									fractures being the most common injury pattern. Over the past
									several decades, there has been a shift from non-operative to surgical treatment
									of displaced supracondylar fractures. Dr. Ponce retrospectively reviewed
									complications from a consecutive case series of 104 displaced supracondylar
									humerus fractures treated with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning
									at Children’s Hospital, Boston. The purpose of Dr. Ponce’s study was to evaluate
									the necessity of clinical and radiographic evaluation within 10 days of
									closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. Group 1(52 patients) had initial
									follow-up radiographs with 10 days and Group 2 (52 patients) had follow-up
									radiographs after 10 days or at time of pin removal. The overall complication
									rate was 7.7%. No association between late follow-up and complications was
									identified. It was concluded that clinical and radiographic evaluation of displaced
									supracondylar fractures requiring closed reduction and percutaneous
									pinning can be safely delayed until time of pin removal. Dr. Kasser commended Dr. Ponce for investigating the relationship
									between follow-up and complications in an injury for which Children’s
									Hospital manages approximately 250 cases per year. Dr. Kasser questioned
									what 10-day follow-up may offer, when the primary decision point is the 3
									week pin removal. In this investigation, no benefit or decrease in complications
									was shown by clinical and radiological evaluation at 10 days.
 |  
 
							
								| 
										 
											|  |  |  
											| Eric Giza, MD | Tammy Martin, MD |  | Part I: An Analysis of Injuries in the Women’s United Soccer Association Part II: Implementation of a Prospective National Injury Registry for Professional Soccer
 Eric Giza, MD
 Discussor: Tammy Martin, MD
 Advisor: Thomas Gill, MD
 
 In Part I, Dr. Giza discussed his analysis of soccer injuries in the first two
									years of the Women’s United Soccer Association (WUSA). In this preliminary
									study, information on injuries was obtained from an insurance company
									database and subsequently confirmed by team trainers. The overall injury
									incidence rate was 1.93 injuries per 1000 player hours. The most common
									location was the knee (31.8%), followed by the head (10.4%), ankle (9.3%),
									and foot (9.3%). Of the head injuries, fractures of nasal and facial bones were
									the most common, followed by concussions. More injuries occurred in the
									latter portion of the season which may be related to deconditioning and
									increased intensity during the playoffs. In Part II, Dr. Giza reported on his work on implementing an injury
									database for professional soccer, in an effort to prospectively study injuries
									and improve the safety and health of professional athletes. The goals of this
									database include improving the standard of medical record keeping for professional
									soccer players, evaluating the effectiveness of current treatment
									methods, and providing a large sample of epidemiological data. Dr. Martin commended Dr. Giza on this preliminary study of injuries in
									professional female soccer players. She raised the notion of under-reporting
									of injuries by players and questioned whether the true incidence of injury can
									be accurately obtained in order to institute an injury prevention program.
									Interestingly, Dr. Martin noted that despite a lower injury rate compared
									to the men’s MLS league, WUSA players still had a higher ACL injury rate.
									Therefore, even with higher levels of training, the ACL injury rate in female
									athletes remains higher than in males. Dr. Martin also expressed her concern
									over the number of head injuries and encouraged efforts to monitor their
									effects over time.
 |  
 
							
								| 
										 
											|  |  |  
											| James O'Holleran, MD | Tom Gill, MD |  | Outcomes Assesment in the Shoulder James O'Holleran, MD
 Discussor: Tom Gill, MD
 Advisor: Mininder Kocher, MD
 
 Historically, outcomes after shoulder surgery have largely relied upon
									physician-based assessments. Over the past decade, however, the importance
									of patients' subjective evaluations of outcome has been recognized. In
									Dr. O’Holleran's three-part study, he examined the determinants of patient
									satisfaction after rotator cuff surgery and anterior instability surgery. He also
									examined the reliability and validity of the American Shoulder and Elbow
									Surgeons (ASES) shoulder score. Dr. O'Holleran found that the most robust
									associations with patient satisfaction after rotator cuff repair and anterior
									instability surgery and outcomes were related to subjective variables of symptoms
									and function. Overall, most patients would have the surgery again and
									most would recommend it to another. In the third part of Dr. O'Holleran’s
									study, the ASES shoulder score demonstrated an acceptable psychometric
									performance for outcomes assessment in patients with rotator cuff disease,
									instability, and arthritis. Dr. Gill commended Dr. O'Holleran on a timely and elegant study which
									will contribute to the ongoing debate on outcome assessments. Historically,
									patient satisfaction had rarely been addressed, but Dr. O'Holleran’s study
									emphasizes the importance of patient-derived subjective assessments in
									evaluating the outcomes of shoulder surgery.
 |  |  |  |